Graduate Courses

This seminar uses a sample of twenty films (with clips from many others) to survey four decades of the tradition of French cinema crowned by the privileged moment of the New Wave. Graduate students are asked to challenge the idea of “national cinema” by reporting on some non-canonical or marginal film before midterm. Keeping the culture industry in view, we question the extent to which such a consistently robust cinema has been bound to—or remained partly independent of—a nation that from 1930 to 1970 underwent a depression, a socialist experiment, an occupation, a liberation, and the humiliations of decolonization abroad and social unrest (May ’68) at home. In addition to the midterm contribution, graduate students write a substantial term paper.

This seminar uses a sample of twenty films (with clips from many others) to survey four decades of the tradition of French cinema crowned by the privileged moment of the New Wave. Graduate students are asked to challenge the idea of “national cinema” by reporting on some non-canonical or marginal film before midterm. Keeping the culture industry in view, we question the extent to which such a consistently robust cinema has been bound to—or remained partly independent of—a nation that from 1930 to 1970 underwent a depression, a socialist experiment, an occupation, a liberation, and the humiliations of decolonization abroad and social unrest (May ‘68) at home. In addition to the midterm contribution, graduate students write a substantial term paper.

 In 1976, the paired concepts “Ideology and Utopia” appear in the bibliographies of both Paul Ricoeur and Fredric Jameson, two towering intellectuals with exceptionally long careers. This seminar will examine the indispensable place of aesthetics and interpretation (mainly of fiction) in their approach to human history and present ethics/politics.  Ricoeur had just published The Rule of Metaphor, arguing that philosophy needs novels and films, as metaphors that open up the future of history and of thought. Jameson preferred Allegory to open up Balzac, science fiction, detective novels, and—starting in 1976—Hollywood and art films. Last year he published Allegories of ideology. 

This seminar will examine Ricoeur on metaphor and Jameson on allegory at the place where both of them labored, narrative, and in view of their mutual belief in history as the (battle)ground of “ideology and utopia.”  Ricoeur’s roots in phenomenology and hermeneutics stress temporality (Temps et Recit), while Jameson’s Marxist structuralism leads him to spatialize narrative as an ideological or cognitive map.  Both men gather vast philosophical traditions; both tangle openly with competing views (Deleuze, Lacan, et al) and both write with an urgency about immediate social consequence, one from a generally Christian aspiration, the other a generally Marxist one. 

Sampling key moments of their vast output, we will also interpret fiction and images as they would have us do, i.e., as extended metaphors or allegories.  We will certainly discuss Godard’s Histoire(s) du Cinéma as a contemporaneous intervention via images in ideology and utopia.    Lanzmann’s Shoah must also be confronted. Participants will prepare two submissions, one extending or disputing the thought of either theorist (due April 1); the other a full reading of a prose narrative or feature film inspired by one or the other of them (May 15).

The course concentrates on the major writers who practiced what is called “magical realism”—Alejo Carpentier, Gabriel García Márquez, Carlos Fuentes, and others—after studying the trend’s antecedents in the colonial, post-independence, and early twentieth century. The role of Jorge Luis Borges in the beginnings of magical realism, the works of writers such as Miguel Ángel Asturias and Juan Rulfo, and those of more recent writers who rejected the trend, such as Roberto Bolaño and Fernando Vallejo. The considerable critical corpus on the topic is studied. In Spanish.

The course concentrates on the major writers who practiced what is called “magical realism”—Alejo Carpentier, Gabriel García Márquez, Carlos Fuentes, and others—after studying the trend’s antecedents in the colonial, post-independence, and early twentieth century. The role of Jorge Luis Borges in the beginnings of magical realism, the works of writers such as Miguel Ángel Asturias and Juan Rulfo, and those of more recent writers who rejected the trend, such as Roberto Bolaño and Fernando Vallejo. The considerable critical corpus on the topic is studied. In Spanish.

This seminar examines the current state of the field of Chinese and Sinophone studies from different geographical and theoretical perspectives. It is a research seminar and colloquium, and we use texts in the original as well as translated languages. Topics vary.

This course is an approach to a cultural history of the Inquisition from its inception and methods, to its theories and practices, to its abolition—although, has it ever been totally abolished? We read literary and nonliterary texts about heresy, the Antichrist, auto de fé, religious protest, and magic and witchcraft.

In this course we study different kinds of narratives about the end of times and its consequences in Iberian and Latin American cultures. We include political, theological, social, and environmental narratives across periodizations in Iberian and Latin American cultures.

This seminar suggests a research project to investigate the affinity between the legal discipline and the science of the soul, or, if you wish, between the science of the soul and the body of law. The point of departure for our framing argument—the existence of this affinity—is that at different moments in history, the legal science (in the form of legal scholarship, religious law, or even legislation) has toiled to appropriate cognitive processes (the external senses, for instance) and post-sensorial operations (imagination, fantasy, memory, etc.). However, this appropriation has become, at different moments in history, so naturalized, so dissolved, so automatized, that it has become invisible for us, and that, because of this invisibility, the affinity can continue doing a political work that is not always evident to us readers, citizens, and clients of the law. In this seminar we read Iberian and Mediterranean primary sources from different confessions, in different languages, and within different legal and political backgrounds—from pre-Socratic thinkers to al-Ghazali, from Averroes and Maimonides to Alfonso X, from Parisian theologians to Spinoza, etc. Likewise, we read theoretical work that allow us to conceptualize the kind of research we are doing.

This seminar introduces students to theories of memory, testimony, and trauma by bringing key works on these topics into dialogue with literary texts by writers of the former French and British empires in Africa. Literary readings may include works by Djebar, Ouologuem, Farès, Salih, Head, Aidoo. Theoretical readings by Arendt, Adorno and Horkheimer, Agamben, Césaire, Derrida, Fanon, Foucault, Mbembe, Spivak.